Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-05-23 | 2020-07-16 |
| 5.63 x 2.72 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism bricks black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2620mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than Xperia X, having a general score of 92.9 against 72.9. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a lot newer than Xperia X, it's a bit thicker and heavier. Xperia X features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 1920px resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with a quite better pixels density.
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a way bigger storage to install games and applications than Xperia X, because it has 96 GB more internal memory and an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB. Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a little faster CPU than Xperia X, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a larger number of faster cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a really longer battery performance than Xperia X, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy A71 5G UW captures way better pictures and videos than Sony Xperia X, because it has a larger aperture, a lot better (4K) video resolution, a lot more megapixels camera in the back and a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy A71 5G UW costs a lot more money than the Xperia X, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.