Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-05-23 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.63 x 2.72 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 205.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2620mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is a lot better than the Sony Xperia X, getting a score of 97.6 against 72.9. Even though Samsung Galaxy Fold is noticeably heavier than the Sony Xperia X, it's just a bit thinner and extremely newer. The Sony Xperia X has a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a way lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better pixel number per inch of display.
Galaxy Fold features a quite better hardware performance than Xperia X, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a larger number of cores (and they are faster). The Galaxy Fold has a little bit better camera than Xperia X, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor and a back facing camera with a much worse resolution, it also counts with a much larger aperture for better low light images and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a superior memory to install games and applications than Xperia X, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a way better battery duration than Xperia X, because it has a 67% more battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xperia X, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xperia X. If you prefer to save some money, you can get Xperia X, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.