Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-05-23 | 2020-09-11 |
| 5.63 x 2.72 x 0.30 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 441 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2620mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 has an overall score of 87.7, which is a lot better than Xperia X's global score of 72.9. Galaxy M51's construction is extremely newer than the Xperia X's, but it is thicker and incredibly heavier. The Xperia X has a slightly better display than Galaxy M51, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater screen density.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia X, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a little faster processing unit than Sony Xperia X, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
Galaxy M51 features a way better battery lifetime than Xperia X, because it has a 7000mAh battery size instead of 2620mAh. The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a better camera than Xperia X, because it has a bigger aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos, a much better (4K) video quality, a way bigger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a lot more megapixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.