Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-05-23 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.63 x 2.72 x 0.30 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2620mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than the Sony Xperia X, having a general score of 98.9 against 72.9. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's body is way newer than Sony Xperia X's, although it is just a little thicker and notably heavier. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a superior processing power than Sony Xperia X, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit more vivid display than Sony Xperia X, because it has a really larger display, a way better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a just a little better display pixels density. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Sony Xperia X, because it has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much better battery performance than Xperia X, because it has a 72% more battery size. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots greater photographs and videos than Sony Xperia X, because it has a much larger sensor capturing way higher quality videos and photos, a lot higher video quality, a bigger camera aperture for better photography and video in low-light situations and a camera in the back with way more mega pixels.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xperia X, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xperia X. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, else you can save some money and get the Xperia X, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.