Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-05-23 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.63 x 2.72 x 0.30 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2620mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than Sony Xperia X, getting a 98 score against 72.9. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a notably newer phone than Sony Xperia X, but it is way heavier and thicker. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little sharper display than Xperia X, because it has a lot higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution, a little better pixel count in each inch in the display and a lot larger display.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a more powerful processing unit than Xperia X, because it has a larger number of cores (and faster) and a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots a lot better photos and videos than Xperia X, because it has a larger camera sensor which provides a better image and video quality, a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a bigger aperture for better low-light photos and video and a back facing camera with a way better 108 megapixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better memory for apps and games than Xperia X, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal memory capacity. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much longer battery performance than Xperia X, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than Sony Xperia X, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Sony Xperia X. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Sony Xperia X, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.