Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-05-23 | -- |
| 5.63 x 2.72 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 5.36 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2620mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 is much better than Xperia X, with a overall score of 82.6 against 72.9. Samsung Galaxy S25's body is thinner and a lot lighter than the Xperia X. Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a much better screen than Xperia X, because although it has a little worse pixels density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bigger display.
Galaxy S25 features a quite bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia X, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. Xperia X has a very superior CPU than Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S25 features a really longer battery lifetime than Xperia X, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. Samsung Galaxy S25 captures greater photos and videos than Xperia X, because it has a way better video quality, a larger aperture to capture better low-light captures and video, a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a much larger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Although Samsung Galaxy S25 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xperia X, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xperia X. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the Xperia X, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.