Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-05-23 | -- |
| 5.63 x 2.72 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 5.36 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2620mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has an overall score of 90.7, which is a lot better than the Xperia X's 72.9 general score. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a extremely thinner and noticeably lighter phone than the Xperia X. Sony Xperia X has a way better processing power than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 9 GB lesser RAM memory and 2 less processing cores.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra features an incredibly better looking display than Sony Xperia X, because it has a much larger screen, a lot better 1440 x 3088px resolution and a just a bit better pixels amount in each inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Xperia X, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Xperia X, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 2620mAh. Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Xperia X, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photography, a way higher video resolution, a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.