Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2016-05-23 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.63 x 2.72 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 205.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 441 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2620mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is slightly better than the Xperia X, with an 80.1 score against 72.9. Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a notably newer phone than Xperia X, although it's much thicker and extremely heavier. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a little better hardware performance than Sony Xperia X, because it has a larger number of cores (and they are faster) and a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little sharper screen than Xperia X, because it has a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution, a little bigger screen and a better quantity of pixels per screen inch. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features much more storage to store more games and applications than Sony Xperia X, because it has more internal storage and an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Sony Xperia X shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Sony Xperia X also counts with a bigger sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality and a back camera with way more megapixels.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a very superior battery life than Xperia X, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xperia X, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xperia X. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Xperia X, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.