Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-05-23 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.63 x 2.72 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2620mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is better than the Sony Xperia X, with a score of 81 against 72.9. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro body is extremely newer than the Sony Xperia X's, but it is a lot heavier and much thicker. The Xperia X counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a way smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit better screen density.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a very superior storage for games and applications than Xperia X, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit better processing unit than Xperia X, because it has a larger number of cores (and they are faster) and 1 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy XCover Pro has a much better battery life than Xperia X, because it has a 55% larger battery capacity. Sony Xperia X features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a lower video definition, a back-facing camera with a lower 23 megapixels resolution and a tinier aperture which is not good for low light photography, it also counts with a way larger sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Sony Xperia X, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Sony Xperia X. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy XCover Pro, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Sony Xperia X, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.