Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-05-23 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.63 x 2.72 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 205.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2620mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is much better than the Xperia X's 72.9 score. The Galaxy Z Flip is a noticeably newer and a bit thinner phone than Xperia X, although it is heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a bit sharper display than Xperia X, because although it has a bit worse count of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2636px resolution and a really larger display.
The Galaxy Z Flip features a much greater memory for apps and games than Xperia X, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Galaxy Z Flip has a superior processing power than Xperia X, because it has a higher number of cores (and faster) and more RAM.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with longer battery lifetime than Xperia X, because it has a 26 percent greater battery size. The Galaxy Z Flip shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Xperia X, because although it has a way worse 12 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a tinier sensor taking lower quality videos and photographs, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low-light photos and video and a lot better video quality.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Sony Xperia X, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Sony Xperia X. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Sony Xperia X, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.