Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-05-23 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.63 x 2.72 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 205.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2620mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a score of 92.3, which is a lot better than the Xperia X's 72.9 general score. Although the Galaxy Z Flip 5G is heavier than the Xperia X, it's just a little thinner and way newer. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a superior performance than Xperia X, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores (and they are faster).
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little bit better screen than Sony Xperia X, because although it has a just a bit lower display pixels density, it also counts with a lot bigger screen and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with just a bit better camera than Xperia X, because although it has a back facing camera with way less megapixels resolution and a smaller camera sensor taking less light and dull colors, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better captures in poorly lited environments and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Sony Xperia X, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has better battery performance than Xperia X, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 2620mAh.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a lot more than Xperia X, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.