Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-05-23 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.63 x 2.72 x 0.30 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 205.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 10.12 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2620mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a general score of 90.6, which is a lot better than the Xperia X's 72.9 score. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 design is much newer and somewhat thinner than the Xperia X's, although it's also way heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a better processing power than Xperia X, because it has more CPU cores and more RAM.
Sony Xperia X features just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a much lower 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater screen density. Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a much better storage for games and applications than Sony Xperia X, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a much longer battery duration than Xperia X, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity. Xperia X captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels and a bigger aperture to take better captures and video in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.