Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Xiaomi |
| 2016-05-23 | 2018-11-01 |
| 5.63 x 2.72 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and Green |
| Metal | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 205.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2620mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is better than Xperia X, with a overall score of 83.8 against 72.9. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 design is newer than Xperia X's, although it's notably heavier and just a little thicker. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a little faster processor than Xperia X, because it has a greater number of cores (and also faster) and more RAM.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a little sharper screen than Xperia X, because although it has a just a little lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a larger screen. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 captures slightly better photos and videos than Xperia X, because although it has a tinier sensor and a back-facing camera with way less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture and a much higher video resolution.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Sony Xperia X, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features superior battery performance than Xperia X, because it has a 22% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.