Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-07-24 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.46 x 3.11 x 0.33 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 192.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.16 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.50 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a has an overall score of 78.8, which is better than Xperia XA Ultra's global score of 71. Google Pixel 3a is a much newer device, and it is also notably lighter and a little thinner than Xperia XA Ultra. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS, but Google Pixel 3a has the previous 11 version and Xperia XA Ultra has Android 7.0 Nougat.
The Google Pixel 3a has a little more vivid screen than Sony Xperia XA Ultra, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater number of pixels in each inch of display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2220 resolution. The Xperia XA Ultra and the Google Pixel 3a both have incredibly similar CPUs, and although the Google Pixel 3a has a higher amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The Google Pixel 3a has just a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Xperia XA Ultra, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 48 GB more internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 3a has a camera that's very similar to the Xperia XA Ultra one, because although the Google Pixel 3a has a much lower 12.2 MP resolution back-facing camera and a smaller sensor which provides a lower image and video quality, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition and a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light images and video.
Google Pixel 3a counts with a little longer battery duration than Sony Xperia XA Ultra, because it has an 11 percent greater battery capacity.
Google Pixel 3a is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.