Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-09-21 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.34 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Pink | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 16 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is much better than Xperia XA1 Plus's 73.7 overall score. LG Velvet is a a lot newer phone, and it is also a little lighter and a bit thinner than Xperia XA1 Plus. The LG Velvet and Sony Xperia XA1 Plus have quite similar screens, because although the LG Velvet has a little bit worse display density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2460 resolution and a bigger display.
The LG Velvet features a little faster processing unit than Sony Xperia XA1 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Velvet also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The LG Velvet features a better camera than Xperia XA1 Plus, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back, a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger aperture to take better captures and videos in low light environments.
LG Velvet counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Sony Xperia XA1 Plus, because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Velvet counts with superior battery life than Xperia XA1 Plus, because it has a 25% greater battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the LG Velvet is also a lot cheaper, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.