Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-05-05 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.50 x 3.11 x 0.32 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Just black |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is better than Xperia XA1 Ultra, getting an 82.9 score against 72.8. Google Pixel 4a is a much lighter phone than Xperia XA1 Ultra, but both of them are 0.32inches thick. Google Pixel 4a features just a bit better screen than Sony Xperia XA1 Ultra, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels density and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
The Google Pixel 4a features a processor that is just as good as the Xperia XA1 Ultra one, and although the Google Pixel 4a has 2 GB more RAM, they both have 8 cores. Google Pixel 4a has a bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xperia XA1 Ultra, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The Google Pixel 4a counts with a slightly better camera than Xperia XA1 Ultra, because although it has a back camera with a lot worse resolution and a tinier camera sensor providing a lower image quality, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better images and videos in low light environments.
The Google Pixel 4a has longer battery performance than Sony Xperia XA1 Ultra, because it has 3140mAh of battery capacity against 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.