Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| 2017-05-05 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.50 x 3.11 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | P-OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is much better than Xperia XA1 Ultra, getting an 81.3 score against 72.8. LG V35 ThinQ is a newer cellphone, and it is also lighter and just a little bit thinner than Xperia XA1 Ultra. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit superior processing unit than Xperia XA1 Ultra, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ features a more vivid display than Sony Xperia XA1 Ultra, and although they both have a same size screen, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a better display density and a lot higher 1440 x 2880 resolution. LG V35 ThinQ has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia XA1 Ultra, because it has 64 GB internal storage and an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
LG V35 ThinQ captures much better photos and videos than Sony Xperia XA1 Ultra, because although it has a much less mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a much smaller camera sensor which offers a lot worse photo and video quality, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better images in low light situations.
LG V35 ThinQ has greater battery duration than Xperia XA1 Ultra, because it has a 22% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.