Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-05-05 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.50 x 3.11 x 0.32 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is much better than the Sony Xperia XA1 Ultra, getting a global score of 87 against 72.8. The Motorola razr (2020) design is extremely newer and just a bit thinner than the Sony Xperia XA1 Ultra's, although it is just a bit heavier. The Motorola razr (2020) and Xperia XA1 Ultra have really similar screens, because although the Motorola razr (2020) has a little lower resolution of 876 x 2142 pixels, it also counts with a quite greater screen density and a little bit bigger screen.
Motorola razr (2020) has a little better processing power than Sony Xperia XA1 Ultra, and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has more RAM memory. The Motorola razr (2020) shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Xperia XA1 Ultra, because it has a back facing camera with a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution, a bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photos and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light images.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Sony Xperia XA1 Ultra, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little longer battery performance than Sony Xperia XA1 Ultra, because it has a 4% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.