Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| 2017-05-05 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.50 x 3.11 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is better than the Xperia XA1 Ultra's general score of 72.8. Galaxy A50's design is newer, somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Xperia XA1 Ultra. Galaxy A50 and Xperia XA1 Ultra have quite similar processing units, they have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM.
Galaxy A50 counts with a bit sharper display than Xperia XA1 Ultra, because it has a little bit greater quantity of pixels in each inch in the display, a quite larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy A50 shoots better videos and photos than Xperia XA1 Ultra, because although it has a tinier camera sensor shooting worse quality videos and photographs, it also counts with a back facing camera with a higher 25 megapixels resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography and video.
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a much bigger storage for games and applications than Xperia XA1 Ultra, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB and 96 GB more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a much longer battery life than Sony Xperia XA1 Ultra, because it has a 48 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.