Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2017-05-05 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.50 x 3.11 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | -- |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is way better than Xperia XA1 Ultra, having a 91.3 score against 72.8. Galaxy A52 5G is a much newer phone than the Xperia XA1 Ultra, but it is just a little bit thicker and just a little heavier. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit better looking screen than Sony Xperia XA1 Ultra, because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a quite bigger display and a little more pixels per inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G and Xperia XA1 Ultra count with incredibly similar CPUs, and although the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a greater amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy A52 5G has a very superior camera than Sony Xperia XA1 Ultra, because it has a much larger camera sensor which offers a much better image and video quality, a back facing camera with a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light images and video.
Galaxy A52 5G has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Sony Xperia XA1 Ultra, because it has more internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XA1 Ultra, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.