Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-05-05 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.50 x 3.11 x 0.32 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A70 is a little bit better than Xperia XA1 Ultra, having a 76.9 score against 72.8. Samsung Galaxy A70's design is newer, a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than Xperia XA1 Ultra. Samsung Galaxy A70 features a bit more vivid screen than Xperia XA1 Ultra, because it has a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a bit bigger display and a just a bit better pixel density.
The Xperia XA1 Ultra features just a bit better performance than Galaxy A70, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy A70 counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Xperia XA1 Ultra, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A70 features a very superior battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XA1 Ultra, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Xperia XA1 Ultra shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs and video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.