Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-05-05 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.50 x 3.11 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is much better than the Xperia XA1 Ultra's 72.8 score. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a much newer device, and it is also somewhat thinner and just a little lighter than the Xperia XA1 Ultra. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a little better hardware performance than Xperia XA1 Ultra, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy Z Flip features a bit more vivid screen than Sony Xperia XA1 Ultra, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636px, a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display and a little larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Sony Xperia XA1 Ultra, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip takes much better photos and videos than Xperia XA1 Ultra, because although it has a much less mega-pixels camera in the back and a tinier back-facing camera sensor shooting worse quality photos, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture. Galaxy Z Flip counts with improved battery performance than Xperia XA1 Ultra, because it has a 22 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.