Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-05-05 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.50 x 3.11 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is a lot better than Sony Xperia XA1 Ultra's score of 72.8. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a much newer device, and it is also a little bit lighter and thinner than Sony Xperia XA1 Ultra. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit better looking screen than Xperia XA1 Ultra, because it has a just a little better quantity of pixels in each inch of display, a little higher 1080 x 2636px resolution and a quite larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit superior CPU than Sony Xperia XA1 Ultra, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 4 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Sony Xperia XA1 Ultra, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with greater battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XA1 Ultra, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a better camera than Xperia XA1 Ultra, because although it has a tinier sensor shooting worse quality videos and photographs and a way less megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.