Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-05-05 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.50 x 3.11 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a global score of 94.6, which is way better than Xperia XA1 Ultra's 72.8 overall score. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way heavier than Xperia XA1 Ultra, it's somewhat thinner and noticeably newer. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little better performance than Xperia XA1 Ultra, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little sharper display than Xperia XA1 Ultra, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display, a larger display and a better 1768 x 2208 resolution. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a lot bigger memory to store more games and applications than Xperia XA1 Ultra, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much better battery life than Xperia XA1 Ultra, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 2700mAh. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 captures better pictures and videos than Xperia XA1 Ultra, because although it has a much less mega-pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.