Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| 2017-05-01 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.71 x 2.64 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is much better than Sony Xperia XA1, getting a overall score of 81.3 against 71.7. Although the LG V35 ThinQ is a little heavier than Sony Xperia XA1, it's just a little bit thinner and newer. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful processor than Xperia XA1, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ features a much better looking display than Xperia XA1, because it has a much greater amount of pixels per screen inch, a much better resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a bigger screen. The LG V35 ThinQ features a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Sony Xperia XA1, because it has an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage.
The LG V35 ThinQ shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Xperia XA1, because although it has a lot smaller back-facing camera sensor providing a lot lower image quality and a back-facing camera with a way worse 16 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better images in low light environments and a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better battery duration than Sony Xperia XA1, because it has a 43% more battery size.
The LG V35 ThinQ is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the Sony Xperia XA1, making it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.