Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2017-05-01 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.71 x 2.64 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot better than the Xperia XA1, with a 95.4 score against 71.7. Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is way newer than Xperia XA1, it's thicker and extremely heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much more vibrant screen than Xperia XA1, because it has a way higher pixels density, a really larger display and a much better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has just a little better processing power than Sony Xperia XA1, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a way better camera than Sony Xperia XA1, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video quality, a bigger aperture, a camera with a lot higher resolution and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Sony Xperia XA1, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a superior battery performance than Sony Xperia XA1, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 2300mAh.
Galaxy S22 Ultra costs a lot more money than the Xperia XA1, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.