Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-05-01 | -- |
| 5.71 x 2.64 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.04 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | -- |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a lot better than the Xperia XA1, having a global score of 90.7 against 71.7. The Galaxy S25 Ultra construction is incredibly lighter and a lot thinner than the Xperia XA1. The Xperia XA1 features a lot better performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much more vibrant display than Sony Xperia XA1, because it has a lot larger display, a way higher display density and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra takes way better photos and videos than Sony Xperia XA1, because it has a lot larger sensor which offers a way higher photo and video quality, a lot more mega-pixels back camera, a much better video quality and a bigger aperture.
Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Xperia XA1, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much longer battery duration than Xperia XA1, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.