Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.18 x 2.95 x 0.38 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3580mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is a lot better than Xperia XA2 Plus's overall score of 78.6. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's body is newer and thinner than Xperia XA2 Plus's, although it's just a little bit heavier. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has older 13 version and Xperia XA2 Plus has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little better performance than Xperia XA2 Plus, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a slightly better looking display than Xperia XA2 Plus, because it has a little higher quantity of pixels in each inch of display, a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution and a larger display.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a superior storage to store more games and applications than Xperia XA2 Plus, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features improved battery life than Xperia XA2 Plus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3580mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much better camera than Xperia XA2 Plus, because it has a lot better video definition, a back facing camera with way more mega pixels, a way larger sensor providing a much better image quality and a bigger aperture to take better images and videos in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.