Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-02-16 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.42 x 3.15 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3580mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL is slightly better than the Xperia XA2 Ultra, with a score of 78.9 against 75.5. The Google Pixel 3a XL is a newer phone, and it is also noticeably lighter and thinner than the Xperia XA2 Ultra. The Xperia XA2 Ultra counts with a little bit better display than Google Pixel 3a XL, although it has a just a little inferior pixels quantity in each screen inch and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, they both have a screen with the same size.
The Xperia XA2 Ultra has a bit faster CPU than Google Pixel 3a XL. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM amount. The Xperia XA2 Ultra counts with a bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 256 GB.
The Google Pixel 3a XL features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity. The Xperia XA2 Ultra has a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs and video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xperia XA2 Ultra also counts with a camera with a much better 23 mega pixels resolution and a bigger back camera sensor taking higher quality photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.