Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-02-16 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.42 x 3.15 x 0.37 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3580mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is much better than Xperia XA2 Ultra, with a global score of 87.6 against 75.5. The LG V60 ThinQ construction is notably newer, just a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner than the Xperia XA2 Ultra. LG V60 ThinQ has a bit faster CPU than Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
The Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra features a little sharper screen than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a little worse pixels density, a bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution and a bit smaller display. The Xperia XA2 Ultra counts with a slightly better camera than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light images and video, a camera with a much worse resolution, a way worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a lot smaller sensor which provides a much worse image and video quality.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG V60 ThinQ features a way better battery life than Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3580mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.