Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-02-16 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.42 x 3.15 x 0.37 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3580mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto Z Force is a bit better than the Xperia XA2 Ultra, getting a overall score of 75.8 against 75.5. Moto Z Force's design is a lot lighter and thinner than the Xperia XA2 Ultra, although it was released around a year before. Moto Z Force has a little sharper display than Xperia XA2 Ultra, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen pixels density and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution.
Moto Z Force counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal memory capacity. The Xperia XA2 Ultra counts with a little bit better performance than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Xperia XA2 Ultra also has more cpu cores.
The Xperia XA2 Ultra features just a bit better camera than Moto Z Force, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for shooting images and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Xperia XA2 Ultra also counts with a better 23 megapixels resolution back camera.
The Xperia XA2 Ultra counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has a 2% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.