Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-02-16 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.42 x 3.15 x 0.37 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3580mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G is way better than Xperia XA2 Ultra, with a general score of 90.8 against 75.5. Galaxy A51 5G's design is noticeably newer, just a bit thinner and somewhat lighter than Xperia XA2 Ultra. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Xperia XA2 Ultra, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Xperia XA2 Ultra counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, although it has a bit smaller display, a bit lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a quite lower pixels density. Galaxy A51 5G features a superior camera than Xperia XA2 Ultra, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same (4K) video quality and a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a way higher resolution camera.
Galaxy A51 5G features a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy A51 5G features greater battery life than Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3580mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.