Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-02-16 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.42 x 3.15 x 0.37 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3580mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 is slightly better than Xperia XA2 Ultra, having a score of 76.9 against 75.5. Galaxy A70's body is newer, thinner and somewhat lighter than Xperia XA2 Ultra. Galaxy A70 has a processor that is very similar to the CPU in Xperia XA2 Ultra, and although the Galaxy A70 has a larger amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Xperia XA2 Ultra has just a bit better screen than Galaxy A70, although it has a quite lower 1080 x 1920px resolution, a bit smaller display and a little bit worse screen pixel density. Xperia XA2 Ultra takes way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Xperia XA2 Ultra also counts with a bigger sensor capturing better quality photographs and videos.
The Galaxy A70 has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia XA2 Ultra, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A70 has better battery duration than Xperia XA2 Ultra, because it has a 26% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.