Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-02-16 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.42 x 3.15 x 0.37 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3580mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is a lot better than the Xperia XA2 Ultra's score of 75.5. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's construction is way newer and a bit thinner than Xperia XA2 Ultra's, but it is a little heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little more vivid screen than Xperia XA2 Ultra, because it has a way better 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution, a greater quantity of pixels per screen inch and a larger screen.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra, because it has 96 GB more internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little better hardware performance than Xperia XA2 Ultra, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a very superior camera than Xperia XA2 Ultra, because it has a larger camera aperture to take better low light images and video, a lot higher resolution back facing camera, a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a bigger sensor taking higher quality videos and photographs.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a superior battery life than Xperia XA2 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3580mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.