Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-02-16 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.42 x 3.15 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 367 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3580mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a global score of 80.1, which is just a bit better than the Xperia XA2 Ultra's global score of 75.5. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a noticeably newer cellphone than the Xperia XA2 Ultra, but it is somewhat heavier and thicker. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit sharper screen than Xperia XA2 Ultra, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and much more pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia XA2 Ultra, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB and 64 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit better processing power than Xperia XA2 Ultra. Both have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processor.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with better battery performance than Xperia XA2 Ultra, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3580mAh. Xperia XA2 Ultra shoots a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and videos, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor providing a better image quality, a way better video definition and a back-facing camera with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.