Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-02-16 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.42 x 3.15 x 0.37 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3580mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is much better than the Xperia XA2 Ultra's overall score of 75.5. Galaxy Z Flip is a newer phone, and it's also lighter and a lot thinner than the Xperia XA2 Ultra. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a screen that is very similar to Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra's display, although the Galaxy Z Flip also has a bit larger display, a quite better quantity of pixels in each screen inch and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a bit superior processor than Xperia XA2 Ultra, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than Xperia XA2 Ultra, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra features a little longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 3580mAh battery size against 3300mAh. Xperia XA2 Ultra has a slightly better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for low light captures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xperia XA2 Ultra also counts with a larger sensor providing a higher image quality and a lot better resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.