Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-02-16 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.42 x 3.15 x 0.37 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3580mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a general score of 85.6, which is much better than the Xperia XA2 Ultra's 75.5 general score. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a notably newer phone, and it is also somewhat lighter and extremely thinner than Xperia XA2 Ultra. Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a screen that is very similar to the Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra one, although the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a bit better number of pixels in each inch in the display, a little larger display and a quite better 1080 x 2636 resolution.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Xperia XA2 Ultra, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has 4 GB more RAM. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia XA2 Ultra, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Xperia XA2 Ultra has a bit superior battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 3580mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. The Xperia XA2 Ultra captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light photos, it also counts with a way higher resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.