Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-02-16 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.42 x 3.15 x 0.37 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3580mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a global score of 92.3, which is way better than Xperia XA2 Ultra's score of 75.5. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G construction is notably newer, a lot thinner and somewhat lighter than the Xperia XA2 Ultra. Galaxy Z Flip 5G and Xperia XA2 Ultra both feature extremely similar screens, although the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a little more pixels per screen inch, a little bit bigger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2636 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xperia XA2 Ultra, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit superior processor than Xperia XA2 Ultra, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra counts with just a bit better battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has an 8% larger battery capacity. The Xperia XA2 Ultra features a slightly better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has worse video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light captures, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xperia XA2 Ultra also counts with a way more MP camera in the back and a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.