Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-02-16 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.42 x 3.15 x 0.37 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3580mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than the Xperia XA2 Ultra, getting a general score of 90.6 against 75.5. Although the Galaxy Z Fold 3 is somewhat heavier than the Xperia XA2 Ultra, it's incredibly thinner and also noticeably newer. The Xperia XA2 Ultra features a little bit better looking display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, although it has a way smaller screen, a lot worse 1080 x 1920 resolution and a just a little worse pixel amount per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a little better hardware performance than Xperia XA2 Ultra, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM memory. Galaxy Z Fold 3 has much more storage capacity for applications and games than Xperia XA2 Ultra, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features improved battery lifetime than Xperia XA2 Ultra, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 3580mAh. The Xperia XA2 Ultra captures a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a lot more MP camera and a bigger diafragm aperture for better photos in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.