Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-02-16 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.59 x 2.76 x 0.38 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a is a bit better than Xperia XA2, getting a general score of 78.8 against 74.8. The Google Pixel 3a construction is newer, somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than Xperia XA2. The Xperia XA2 has a bit more powerful CPU than Google Pixel 3a, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Xperia XA2 features a little sharper display than Google Pixel 3a, although it has a little less pixels per screen inch, a quite smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 1920px resolution. Xperia XA2 features more memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 256 GB.
Xperia XA2 counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 3300mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh. Xperia XA2 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light photography, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Xperia XA2 also counts with a camera with a much better resolution and a bigger camera sensor capturing better quality pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.