Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-02-16 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.59 x 2.76 x 0.38 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto Z Force is slightly better than the Sony Xperia XA2, getting a 75.8 score against 74.8. Despite of the fact that the Moto Z Force is older than Sony Xperia XA2, it's construction is a little bit lighter and way thinner. Moto Z Force counts with a screen that is just as good as Xperia XA2's display, although the Moto Z Force also has a better 1440 x 2560 resolution, a better pixels number per inch in the display and a little bit bigger screen.
Xperia XA2 features a bit faster processor than Moto Z Force, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with 4 more 2.2 GHz cores. Moto Z Force features a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia XA2, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Moto Z Force counts with just a little better battery duration than Xperia XA2, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. The Xperia XA2 has just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking images or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Xperia XA2 also counts with a back facing camera with more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.