Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-02-16 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.59 x 2.76 x 0.38 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a global score of 98, which is much better than the Xperia XA2's score of 74.8. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's design is a lot newer and a bit thinner, but also noticeably heavier than the Xperia XA2. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit better screen than Xperia XA2, because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels, a way larger display and a little bit more pixels per inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit better performance than Xperia XA2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 9 GB more RAM. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots way better videos and photos than Sony Xperia XA2, because it has a much more mega-pixels back camera, a bigger sensor, a bigger aperture and a way higher video resolution.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much greater memory for applications and games than Xperia XA2, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better battery lifetime than Xperia XA2, because it has a 52% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.