Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-02-16 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.59 x 2.76 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 424 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a global score of 80.1, which is a bit better than Xperia XA2's 74.8 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro construction is noticeably newer, but way heavier and incredibly thicker than Xperia XA2. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little better performance than Xperia XA2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little sharper display than Xperia XA2, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a lot bigger memory to store more games and applications than Xperia XA2, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB and 32 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features superior battery life than Xperia XA2, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh. The Xperia XA2 captures a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light photos and video, it also counts with a back camera with much more mega-pixels, a larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.