Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-06-01 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Pink, Red and Silver | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 801 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is slightly better than Xperia XZ Premium, with an 82.5 score against 79.8. The LG V30S ThinQ is a newer cellphone, and it is also lighter and a little thinner than the Xperia XZ Premium. The LG V30S ThinQ has a little faster processing unit than Xperia XZ Premium, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Xperia XZ Premium has a better screen than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a way better 2160 x 3840 resolution. Xperia XZ Premium has a bit better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Xperia XZ Premium also counts with a back facing camera with a better resolution and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality photographs.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia XZ Premium, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The LG V30S ThinQ features just a bit better battery life than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.