Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| 2017-06-01 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Pink, Red and Silver | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 801 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is a little bit better than the Sony Xperia XZ Premium, getting a overall score of 87.1 against 79.8. The LG Velvet is a a little bit lighter phone than the Sony Xperia XZ Premium, but they are equally thin. The Xperia XZ Premium has a way better screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much better resolution of 2160 x 3840 and a much higher screen density.
LG Velvet features a lot bigger memory to install games and applications than Xperia XZ Premium, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Sony Xperia XZ Premium and LG Velvet both count with similar processors, and although the LG Velvet has more RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The LG Velvet has better battery performance than Xperia XZ Premium, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity. The LG Velvet captures much clearer photographs and videos than Xperia XZ Premium, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the LG Velvet also has a bigger aperture for better images in poorly lited environments, a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a back-facing camera with much more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.