Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-06-01 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Pink, Red and Silver | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 801 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.3 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a bit better than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, getting a score of 87.1 against 79.8. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's design is much newer than the Sony Xperia XZ Premium's, although it is a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier. Xperia XZ Premium features a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
Sony Xperia XZ Premium counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and much lower brightness, it also counts with a lot higher 2160 x 3840 pixels resolution and a way greater pixel quantity per screen inch. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a better camera than Xperia XZ Premium, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a lot larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a back facing camera with a much higher 50 MP resolution, higher 60 fps video frame rates and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photos and videos in low-light situations.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a superior battery life than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3230mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.