Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-06-01 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Pink, Red and Silver | Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 801 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ Premium has a global score of 79.8, which is a bit better than Moto G Power's score of 76.1. Even though Xperia XZ Premium is way older than Moto G Power, it's design is somewhat thinner and a little bit lighter. The Xperia XZ Premium has a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Power. They have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Xperia XZ Premium features a much sharper screen than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher 2160 x 3840px resolution and a way higher display density. The Xperia XZ Premium counts with a little bit better camera than Moto G Power, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Xperia XZ Premium also counts with a back facing camera with more mega pixels and a bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Motorola Moto G Power has slightly more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xperia XZ Premium, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Motorola Moto G Power also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Moto G Power counts with a really longer battery performance than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.