Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-06-01 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black, Pink, Red and Silver | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 801 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 5G is a bit better than the Xperia XZ Premium, having a score of 84.6 against 79.8. The Galaxy A22 5G body is a lot newer, but just a bit heavier and somewhat thicker than Xperia XZ Premium. Xperia XZ Premium features a lot better screen than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way greater number of pixels per display inch and a much higher 2160 x 3840px resolution.
The Galaxy A22 5G counts with much more storage capacity for applications and games than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A22 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Sony Xperia XZ Premium counts with just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM amount.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G and Xperia XZ Premium both feature extremely similar cameras, and although the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a bigger diafragm aperture and a way more mega pixels camera, they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rates. Galaxy A22 5G has a really longer battery life than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3230mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.