Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-06-01 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Pink, Red and Silver | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 801 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ Premium has a general score of 79.8, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A35 5G's overall score of 79.4. The Xperia XZ Premium design is just a little bit lighter and just a little thinner than Galaxy A35 5G, although it was released many years before. The Sony Xperia XZ Premium has a much better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Xperia XZ Premium features a way better looking display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with more brightness, much more pixels per inch of display and a lot higher 2160 x 3840 pixels resolution. Sony Xperia XZ Premium counts with a bit bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 256 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G captures better photos and videos than Xperia XZ Premium, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also has a way better 50 megapixels resolution camera in the back, a bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light captures and videos.
The Galaxy A35 5G has a way better battery duration than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3230mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.