Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2017-06-01 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Pink, Red and Silver | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 801 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is better than the Xperia XZ Premium, with a general score of 91.3 against 79.8. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G construction is incredibly newer and a bit lighter than Xperia XZ Premium's, but it's also just a little bit thicker. Xperia XZ Premium counts with a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way better resolution of 2160 x 3840 and a lot more pixels per inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB and more internal storage capacity. Xperia XZ Premium counts with a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a way better battery lifetime than Xperia XZ Premium, because it has a 39 percent larger battery size. The Galaxy A52 5G shoots better photos and videos than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a much bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels and a larger aperture for better low-light photos and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.